Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search

Help Register
The ABC Café  |  Public Forum: Dealing with Bone Cancer  |  Research Central  |  Topic: Ewing sarcoma and pregnancy « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Ewing sarcoma and pregnancy  (Read 3748 times)
Larisa
Caregiver
Loudmouth
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 559



« on: September 18, 2008, 11:49:59 AM »

The Sept. issue (2008) of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology published an interesting  "case review" paper: "Late Recurrence of Ewing Sarcoma During Pregnancy: A Report of 2 Cases" by DuBois, Steven G. MD*; Perez-Atayde, Antonio R. MD†; McLean, Thomas W. MD‡; Grier, Holcombe E. MD§ from
*Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA
†Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital
§Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
‡Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

From the Abstract: "We report 2 patients with a history of Ewing sarcoma who were diagnosed with recurrent tumor during or immediately after pregnancy. To determine whether the hormonal milieu of pregnancy might have contributed to recurrence, we performed immunohistochemistry for estrogen and progesterone receptors on available tumor tissue. These receptors were not detected by immunohistochemistry. Increased medical surveillance during pregnancy may have resulted in ascertainment of recurrence in these 2 patients."

Here are the case histories of both female patients:
Patient 1:
"Patient 1 was a 9-year-old girl when she presented with hip pain and a palpable thigh mass. Imaging revealed a large mass centered at the right ischium. Biopsy of the mass demonstrated Ewing sarcoma. Metastatic evaluation showed multiple bilateral pulmonary metastases. She received vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide every 3 to 4 weeks for a total of 24 months. After 4 months of therapy, her chest radiograph and pelvic ultrasound were both normal. At that time, she started radiation therapy and received 5620 cGy to the right pelvis. The patient remained free of disease until approximately 9.3 years from the initial diagnosis when she developed enlarging soft tissue masses on her arms and thighs during the third trimester of her first pregnancy. Imaging at that time demonstrated 2 pulmonary nodules, a soft tissue mass on the anterior abdominal wall, and a hemorrhagic lesion in the left frontal lobe. The baby was delivered by caesarian section. Immediately after the successful delivery of the baby, the maternal left frontal lobe lesion was resected. The frontal lobe lesion showed Ewing sarcoma by histopathology. Molecular confirmation was not performed. The placental pathology was normal. The patient received cranial radiation and chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide for approximately 8 months. Shortly after completing chemotherapy, the soft tissue masses on her thighs recurred. No further follow-up is available."
Patient 2:
"Patient 2 was a 15-year-old girl when she presented with chest pain and fever. She was found to have a mass arising from the left 11th rib. The rib and soft tissue mass were resected, but residual tumor remained. Pathologic diagnosis was Ewing sarcoma. Metastatic evaluation was negative. She received 24 months of vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide given every 3 weeks. She also received 5200 cGy radiation to the area of initial tumor involvement. Approximately 5.7 years from initial diagnosis, the patient developed new chest pain 2 days after the uncomplicated delivery of her first child. Imaging revealed a mass involving the hilum of the right lung. Biopsy showed Ewing sarcoma by histopathology without molecular confirmation. Metastatic evaluation was again negative. She received 3 months of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide given every 3 weeks. At the completion of chemotherapy, she received 1500 cGy of radiation to the right lung with an additional 3500 cGy directed at the hilum of the right lung. The patient remained free from cancer until 10 years from first recurrence when she developed papillary thyroid carcinoma. At her last follow-up visit 13 years from first recurrence, she remained free of Ewing sarcoma."

Next, the authors examined the tumor specimens from both patients: "Tumor samples from the initial diagnosis of patient 1 and from the recurrence of patient 2 were available for immunohistochemical staining for estrogen and progesterone receptors. Neither tumor had detectable receptor expression by immunohistochemistry".

The mostly interesting part here is the Discussion:
DISCUSSION

Ewing sarcoma has only rarely been reported during pregnancy. Diagnosis of recurrent Ewing sarcoma during pregnancy seems to be particularly uncommon, with only 2 previous reports.4,6 One patient had a combined local and distant relapse 1 year from initial diagnosis.4 The outcome of this pregnancy was not reported. The second patient had a distant relapse, including placental metastasis, 2 years from initial diagnosis.6 Despite metastasis to the placenta, the child born to this mother was healthy and without evidence of cancer. In both of the patients described here, the presence of recurrent cancer did not adversely affect the outcome of the pregnancy.

In contrast to the previously reported patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma during pregnancy, both patients reported here developed distant metastases more than 5 years from initial diagnosis. Most recurrences of Ewing sarcoma occur within the first 2 years after diagnosis.10–13 However, approximately 20% of patients surviving 5 years from initial diagnosis will ultimately recur.14 Several reports have indicated that patients who recur after 2 years from initial diagnosis have a more favorable outcome compared with patients having early relapse.10–13

The diagnosis of recurrent Ewing sarcoma around the time of pregnancy may have been solely owing to increased contact with medical providers during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period. Alternatively, one might speculate that the hormonal milieu of pregnancy stimulated the growth of quiescent Ewing sarcoma cells. The absence of appropriate receptor expression suggests that estrogen and progesterone were not directly stimulating tumor growth in these cases. This result is consistent with previous reports demonstrating absent or minimal estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in Ewing sarcoma cells.15,16 An indirect effect of estrogen and/or progesterone on tumor growth in these cases can not be ruled out based on the data available. Additional hormonal pathways, such as the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) pathway, may have contributed to these relapses during pregnancy. The IGF-1 pathway is particularly interesting because IGF-1 levels increase in maternal plasma during pregnancy and the IGF-1 receptor seems to be almost universally expressed on Ewing sarcoma cells.17–19

One of the reasons recurrent Ewing sarcoma has been noted only rarely during pregnancy may be due to impaired female fertility after Ewing sarcoma therapy. Analyses from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study indicate that female survivors of childhood cancer have a significantly increased risk of premature ovarian failure.20 This risk increases with exposure to alkylating agents and pelvic radiation, the 2 treatments frequently employed in the treatment of Ewing sarcoma.20

In conclusion, the diagnosis of late recurrent Ewing sarcoma around the time of pregnancy is rare, likely owing to the relative rarity of late recurrence in Ewing sarcoma and the impaired fertility after Ewing sarcoma therapy. The timing of relapse in the patients reported here may be due to increased medical surveillance during pregnancy. Whether the hormonal environment of pregnancy indirectly promotes tumor growth remains unclear from these 2 cases.

Logged

A wife to Ewing's sarcoma Survivor
2nd right rib, diagnosed in Feb 2007
13 rounds of chemo and a surgery on 05/14/07
Tara
Co-leader
Loudmouth
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 758



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2008, 08:14:54 PM »

 Undecided Undecided Undecided Undecided Undecided Undecided Undecided
Poor Dr. Porter and Dr. Hamilton have no clue what I'm going to walk in carrying at my next appointment in January.  A copy of this article.

I was planning on going in, asking for every scan and telling them I was going to go ahead and start trying for a baby.  Just supposed to have a chest xray in January and my next CT won't be until June/July.  I would rather go ahead and do the ct and it will be time for my yearly bone scan in January.  ***If**** I was able to get pregnant before the next appointment, I could still have a chest Xray because they can put lead aprons over everything baby-wise.  Would stay on schedule and have my following CT & Bone scan right on schedule.  My pregnancy would be high risk because of 2 different reasons, so I would get several ultrasounds & very routine bloodwork which would actually keep a watch on my pelvic area.

I was so excited b/c I've ovulated 2 months in a row!!!!  Kevin is actually starting to get on board with the whole idea.  That was awesome news.  NOW... 2 cases are nothing to get all up in arms about, however it does warrant discussion with both of my docs.

Thanks for posting Larissa.  Where can I get this on the web?

Logged

Ewing's Sarcoma survivor, localized to L. Clavicle w/ fibrous dysplasia
3/07 Clavicle excision - 100% kill rate achieved!
12 rounds of chemo 12/06 - 9/07

"They say when God closes a door, He always opens a window...Close your eyes and feel the breeze."
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
The ABC Café  |  Public Forum: Dealing with Bone Cancer  |  Research Central  |  Topic: Ewing sarcoma and pregnancy « previous next »
Jump to:  


© 2005-2008 Mary Sorens. All rights reserved. Contact: info AT abc-survivors.net
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!