Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search

Help Register
The ABC Café  |  Public Forum: Dealing with Bone Cancer  |  General Resources  |  Topic: Bone Cancer - an orphan disease « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Bone Cancer - an orphan disease  (Read 4915 times)
Mary
Be the peace you want to see in the world.
Administrator
Loudmouth
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1963



WWW
« on: November 21, 2005, 06:25:47 PM »

According to the Mayo Clinic, only 2,000 new cases of bone cancer are diagnosed each year. Of those, 35% are osteosarcoma, 25% are chondrosarcoma, and 10% are ewing's sarcoma.

Here is the definition of an orphan diseases from medterms.com:

A disease which has not been "adopted" by the pharmaceutical industry because it provides little financial incentive for the private sector to make and market new medications to treat or prevent it. An orphan disease may be:

1. A rare disease. According to US criteria, an orphan disease is one that affects fewer than 200,000 people. (There are more than 5,000 such rare disorders.)
2. A common disease that has been ignored (such as tuberculosis, cholera, typhoid, and malaria) because it is far more prevalent in developing countries than in the developed world.

The US Orphan Drug Act of 1983 offered tax incentives on clinical trials and 7 years of marketing exclusivity for drugs developed for conditions that occur only rarely in the US. Since then, more than 200 orphan drugs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are on the market. Similar legislation has been adopted in Japan and Australia.

In the year 2000, the European Union adopted "orphan medicinal products" legislation modeled on the US law, but including tropical diseases and other disorders prevalent only in the developing world. The EU law provides for 10 years of marketing exclusivity, but no tax incentives (because there is no centralized EU taxation system).
Logged

Mary, ABC Founder, Parosteal Osteosarcoma Survivor - Humerus Resection 12/03, no chemo
*I am not a doctor. Nothing in this message is medical advice. Please consult your physician.*
Jo Ann
Guest
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2005, 09:39:57 PM »

I hate the word RARE or Orphan disease as it is listed here. Because it means that even physicians who specialize in cancer don't see many cases... I urge all patient's with bone cancer to get a second opinion at a major sarcoma center.. However it is nice to read that someone is trying to help those with bone cancer.. It is HOPE.. It is progress..

Thanks for sharing this Mary,

Jo Ann
Logged
Mike
Survivor
Loudmouth
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 112



WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2005, 06:55:08 AM »

It is very sad, but very true about the pharmaceutical manufacturers not giving "orphan" diseases the attention they deserve. I work for the 2nd largest pharmaceutical company in the world and have asked many times why they develop the meds they do. They'll tell you that they want to develop drugs that will have the most impact for the most people. This is a good argument, but I know that they are driven by their bottom line and their commitment to the shareholders. Don't get me wrong, I love my job and what I do, but I often feel like I work for "The Man". Hopefully one day in the very near future, someone higher up in the corporate food-chain than I am will see that there is value in our little "rare" types of bone cancer and actually throw some R&D money at it.

....Here's hoping....
Logged

Mike
Chondroblastic Osteo Sarcoma - Pelvis
Left Internal Hemipelvectomy
19 Year Survivor
SFSG (So Far So Good)
Allan
Survivor
Quiet member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7



WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2006, 01:41:36 AM »

This one of the sad facts we all live with. If there is no(high rate of return) the pharasuitacle(sp) companies aren't that interested in looking for drugs that will help. Sadly there is no easy answer to this. All we can hope is that by accident they will find what all the bone cancer folks so desperately need.
Logged

28 years osteosarcoma survivor and amputee
Mary
Be the peace you want to see in the world.
Administrator
Loudmouth
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1963



WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2006, 08:48:33 AM »

An excellent article written years ago that still applies to us today:

Orphan Diseases Leave Patients on Their Own
Logged

Mary, ABC Founder, Parosteal Osteosarcoma Survivor - Humerus Resection 12/03, no chemo
*I am not a doctor. Nothing in this message is medical advice. Please consult your physician.*
Cari
Co-leader
Loudmouth
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2640



WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2006, 09:18:39 PM »

I don't like being an orphan! Sad
Logged

Cari, Osteosarcoma survivor, diagnosed 8/2003
lots of chemo, 1-6-04 limbsalvage rt knee & tibia, more chemo--
12/05-patella replacement surgery
11/06 - surgery cyst and scar tissue
3/07-rt lung mets-removed; 4/07 surgery scar tissue
3/09- lung mets removed;4/09 Above Knee amputation
AC-again
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
The ABC Café  |  Public Forum: Dealing with Bone Cancer  |  General Resources  |  Topic: Bone Cancer - an orphan disease « previous next »
Jump to:  


© 2005-2008 Mary Sorens. All rights reserved. Contact: info AT abc-survivors.net
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!